Prediction of overall glucose yield in hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse using a single artificial neural network : good insight for process development
ARTIGO
Inglês
In this work a single artificial neural network (ANN) was used to model the overall yield of glucose (YGLC ) as a function of a wide range of operating conditions of both pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. The model was validated experimentally and presented good predictions of YGLC ....
In this work a single artificial neural network (ANN) was used to model the overall yield of glucose (YGLC ) as a function of a wide range of operating conditions of both pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. The model was validated experimentally and presented good predictions of YGLC . Sensitivity analysis using the ANN model indicated that most of the operating parameters, except for pretreatment time, were statistically significant (P ‐value <0.05). Experiments showed that the processing of sugarcane bagasse (in natura ) results in a satisfactory glucose yield of 69.34% when pretreated for 60 min with low initial biomass concentration and acid concentration (10% and 1.0% w/v), and followed by enzymatic hydrolysis for 72 h with 3.0% w/v substrate loading and 60 FPU per gWIS enzyme concentration. This study demonstrated how pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis data can be used to parameterize a single ANN model. Acceptable predictions of YGLC are achieved in terms of RSD, MSE and R2. Supported by the model, this study provided a good insight for process development
FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESP
2012/10857-3; 2016/01785-0; 2008/57873-8
Fechado
Prediction of overall glucose yield in hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse using a single artificial neural network : good insight for process development
Prediction of overall glucose yield in hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse using a single artificial neural network : good insight for process development
Fontes
Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology Vol. 93, no. 4 (Apr., 2018), p. 1031-1043 |