Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleBenefits And Risks Of Protection And Commercialization Of Academic Research: An Essential Discussion [benefícios E Riscos Da Proteção E Comercialização Da Pesquisa Acadêmica: Uma Discussão Necessária]pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira R.M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVelho L.pt_BR
unicamp.authorde Oliveira, R.M., Departamento de Política, Científica e Tecnológica do Instituto de Geociências da UNICAMP, Brazilpt_BR
unicamp.authorVelho, L., Departamento de Política, Científica e Tecnológica do Instituto de Geociências da UNICAMP, Brazilpt_BR
dc.description.abstractThe research university worldwide has been undergoing considerable internal transformation. The reasons are manifold ranging from changes in publishing behaviour triggered by evaluation and research systems, to social and government pressure on the set up of research agendas, to the difficulty in maintaining adequate infrastructure and qualified human resources up to the newly created mechanisms for protection and commercialization of research results. The latter is the focus of this article, which analyses the diverse and conflicting views of the impact of the patenting and licensing process (IPRs) of academic research results on the traditional activities carried out by universities, namely research and teaching. It argues that the benefits of IPRs must be weighted against the risks involved in this process. The article suggests questions and approaches for new studies that could contribute to monitor and assess Brazilian universities and to design Science and Technology and Higher Education policies. © 2009 Fundação Cesgranrio.en
dc.identifier.citationEnsaio. , v. 17, n. 62, p. 25 - 54, 2009.pt_BR
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-06-26T13:36:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2-s2.0-70350234570.pdf: 304745 bytes, checksum: 78c6e59b90b50dfe94af7a73aa8ae00e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-26T15:36:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 2-s2.0-70350234570.pdf: 304745 bytes, checksum: 78c6e59b90b50dfe94af7a73aa8ae00e (MD5) 2-s2.0-70350234570.pdf.txt: 85836 bytes, checksum: 18cbcc39fa098095e85050ef2f7841ad (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009en
dc.description.referenceAmorim-Borher, M.B., Ensino e pesquisa em propriedade intelectual no Brasil (2007) Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 6, pp. 281-310. , Rio de Janeiro, jul./dezpt_BR
dc.description.reference(2005) A survey summaryof technology licensing (and related) performance for U.S. Academic and Nonprofit Institutions and Technology Investment Firms, ,, Association of University Technology Managers. Chicago, Disponível em: Acesso em: 18 jun. 2007pt_BR
dc.description.referenceBlumenthal, D., Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty (1996) Journal of The American Medical Association, 277, pp. 1224-1228. , Chicago, ILpt_BR
dc.description.referenceBlumenthal, D., Industrial support of University Research in Biotechnology (1986) Science, 231, pp. 242-246. , Danvers, MApt_BR
dc.description.referenceBlumenthal, D., University-Industry Research Relationships in Biotechnology: implications for the university (1986) Science, 232, pp. 1361-1366. , Danvers, MApt_BR
dc.description.reference(2005), Brasil. Decreto n° 5.563, de 11 de outubro de 2005. Regulamenta a Lei n° 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, que dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da República Federativa do Brasil], Brasília, DF, 13 out(2004) Diário Oficial [da República Federativa do Brasil], , Brasil. Lei n° 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo, e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF, 3 dez. 2004pt_BR
dc.description.referenceMinistério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (2001) Relatório, ,, Brasil. Brasília, DF, Disponível em: Acesso em: 23 mar. 2007pt_BR
dc.description.referenceBrisolla, S.N., A relação da universidade co o setor produtivo: o caso da UNICAMP (1990) Revista de Administração da USP, 25 (1), pp. 106-126. , São Paulo, jan./marpt_BR
dc.description.referenceBrisolla, S.N., Relação universidade-empresa: como seria se fosse (1998) Interação universidade-empresa, , Ferreira, José Rincón (Org.), Brasília, DF: IBICT: CNPQ: Instituto Euvaldo Lodipt_BR
dc.description.referenceBrisolla, S.N., (1998) Relatório final: o papel da universidade na pesquisa aplicada e na formação de profissionais: um estudo de caso da Unicamp, , Brisolla, S. N. (Coord.) Campinas, SP: Universidade Estadual de Campinaspt_BR
dc.description.referenceCampbell, E.G., Data withholding in academic genetics (2002) Journal of The American Medical Association, 287, pp. 473-480. , Chicago, ILpt_BR
dc.description.referenceCharles, D., Conway, C., A report by the Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies: University of Newcastle upon Tyne (2001) Higher Education-Business Interaction Survey, ,, Bristol, Research report 01/68. Disponível em: Acesso em: 17 mar. 2008pt_BR
dc.description.referenceDagnino, R., A relação universidade-empresa no Brasil e o argumento da Hélice Tripla (2003) Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 2, pp. 267-308. , Rio de Janeiropt_BR
dc.description.referenceDavid, P.A., Hall, B.H., Property and the pursuit of knowledge: IPR issues affecting scientific research: introduction (2006) Research Policy, 35, pp. 767-771. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceEtzkowitz, H., The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkage (1998) Research Policy, 27, pp. 823-833. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceEtzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (2000) Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceEtzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., (1995) The Triple Helix: university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development, Amsterdam, 1. , Theme Paper: Workshop Amsterdam, 1., 1995, Amsterdam. Proceedings... Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceEtzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Science as intellectual property (1994) Science and technology studies handbook, , London: Sage Publicationspt_BR
dc.description.referenceFeller, I., University patent and technology-licensing strategies (1990) Educational Policy, 4, pp. 327-340. , Thousand Oaks, CApt_BR
dc.description.referenceFujino, A., Stal, E., Gestão da propriedade intelectual na universidade pública brasileira: diretrizes para licenciamento e comercialização (2004) Simpósio de gestão e inovação tecnológica, , 23., 2004, Curitiba. Anais... São Paulo: USP/PGTpt_BR
dc.description.referenceGeuna, A., Nesta, J.J.L., (2004) University patenting and its effects on academic research, ,, Brighton: University of Sussex, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series 99. Disponível em: Acesso em: 15 jun. 2005pt_BR
dc.description.referenceGeuna, A., Nesta, J.J.L., University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence (2006) Research Policy, 35, pp. 790-807. , Amsterdam, Julypt_BR
dc.description.referenceGibbons, M., (1994) The new production of knowledge, , the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Newbury Park, CA: Sagept_BR
dc.description.referenceKaghan, W., Harnessing a public conglomerate: professional technology transfer management and the entrepreneurial university (2001) Degrees of compromise, , Croissant, J.pt_BR
dc.description.referenceRestivo, S. (Ed.), New York: Suny Presspt_BR
dc.description.referenceKline, S., Rosenberg, N., An overview of innovation (1986) The positive sum strategy, , Landau, R.pt_BR
dc.description.referenceRosenberg, N. (Ed.), Washington, DC: National Academy of Presspt_BR
dc.description.referenceLandi, F.R., Gusmão, R., (2005) Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação em São Paulo 2004, , (Coord.). São Paulo: Fapesppt_BR
dc.description.referenceLowe, R.A., Gonzalez-Brambila, C., Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity (2007) The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, pp. 173-194. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceMcCray, W.P., Croissant, J., Entrepreneurship in technology transfer offices: making work possible (2001) Degrees of compromise, , Croissant, J.pt_BR
dc.description.referenceRestivo, S. (Ed.), New York: Suny Presspt_BR
dc.description.referenceMartin, B.R., The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university (2003) Science and innovation, , Geuna, A. et al. (Coord), rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Northamptom, USA: Edward Elgarpt_BR
dc.description.referenceMartin, B.R., Etzkowitz, H., The origin and evolution of the university species (2000) Vest, 31, pp. 9-34. , New Havenpt_BR
dc.description.referenceMerton, R.K., (1970) Sociologia: teoria e estrutura, , São Paulo: Mestre Joupt_BR
dc.description.referenceMetlay, G., Reconsidering renormalization: stability and change in 20th-century views on university patents (2006) Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 565-597. , Thousand Oaks, CApt_BR
dc.description.referenceMowery, D.C., The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980 (2001) Research Policy, 30, pp. 99-119. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceMowery, D.C., Ziedonis, A.A., Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States (2002) Research Policy, 31, pp. 399-418. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceMulkay, M.J., (1979) Science and the sociology of knowledge, , London: George Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltdpt_BR
dc.description.reference(2002) Delivering the commercialization of public sector science, , National Audit Office. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: HMSOpt_BR
dc.description.reference(2006) Science and engineering indicators 2006, ,, National Science Board. Arlington, VA,. Disponível em: Acesso em: 25 junpt_BR
dc.description.referenceNelkin, D., (1984) Science as intellectual property: who controls research?, , New York: Macmillan Publishing Company (AAAS series on issues in science and technology)pt_BR
dc.description.referenceNelsen, L., The rise of intellectual property protection in the American University (1998) Science, 279, pp. 1460-1461. , Danvers, MApt_BR
dc.description.referenceNelson, R.R., Rosenberg, N., Technical innovation and national systems (1993) National Innovation Systems: a comparative analysis, , Nelson, R. R., (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Presspt_BR
dc.description.reference(2002) Draft final report on the strategic use of intellectual property by public research organizations, , OECD, Parispt_BR
dc.description.referenceOliveira, R.M., (2002) A cooperação da Universidade Federal de São Carlos com a sociedade, p. 158. , São Carlos, Dissertação (Mestrado) Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2002pt_BR
dc.description.referencePeters, L.S., (1987) Academic crossroads, , the U.S. experience. New York: RPI: Center For Technology Policy, Octpt_BR
dc.description.referencePlonski, G.A., Cooperação universidade-empresa na Ibero-América: estágio atual e perspectivas (1995) Revista de Administração, 30 (2), pp. 65-74. , São Paulo, abr./junpt_BR
dc.description.referenceSábato, J., Botana, N., (1968) La ciencia y la tecnologia en el desarrollo future de America Latina, ,, Proceedings... Bellagio, Italy, Disponível em: Acesso em: 20 marpt_BR
dc.description.referenceSampat, B.N., Mowery, D.C., Ziedonis, A.A., Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination (2003) International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, pp. 1371-1390. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.referenceSlaugther, S., The traficin graduate students: graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry (2002) Science Technology Human Values, 27, pp. 282-312. , Thousand Oaks, CApt_BR
dc.description.referenceSutz, J., The university-industry-government relations in Latin America (2000) Research Policy, 29, pp. 279-290. , Amsterdampt_BR
dc.description.reference(2008) U.S. colleges and universities-utility patent grants, calendar years 1969-2005, ,, United states patent and trademark office. patents distributed by calendar year of patent application - Explanation of Data. Alexandria, VA, 2007. Disponível em: Acesso em: 12 abrpt_BR
dc.description.referenceVelho, L., Ciências, publicações e avaliação (2008) Olhar, pp. 9-21. , Hoffmann, W.A.M.pt_BR
dc.description.referenceFurnival, A.C. (Org.). ciência, tecnologia e sociedade. São Carlos: Pedro e João Editorespt_BR
dc.description.referenceWebster, A.J., Institutional stability: engineering an environment for biotechnology (1990) Science and Public Policy, 17 (5). , Cambridge, MA, Decpt_BR
dc.description.referenceWebster, A.J., Etzkowitz, H., (1991) Academic-Industry relations: the second academic revolution, (12). , London: Science Policy Support Group, SPSG concept paperpt_BR
dc.description.referenceZiman, J., Academic science as a system of markets (1991) Higher Education Quarterly, (12), pp. 57-68. , Londonpt_BR
dc.description.referenceZiman, J., A ciência da sociedade moderna (1999) A ciência tal qual se faz, , GIL, F. (Coord.). Coleção Humanismo e Ciência. Lisboa: Edições João Sá da Costapt_BR
dc.description.referenceZiman, J., (1994) Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Presspt_BR
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-70350234570.pdf297.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.