Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Type:||Artigo de periódico|
|Title:||Analysis Of Epistemological Approximations And Distancing Of The Notions Of Field In P. Bourdieu And Arena In E. Ostrom [uma Análise Das Aproximações E Distanciamentos Epistemológicos Das Noções De Campo Em P. Bourdieu E De Arena Em E. Ostrom]|
Da Costa Ferreira L.
|Abstract:||The proper choice of an epistemological cross-section in Sociology is frequently as important as the research activity. In fact, its correct limitation may either make feasible research or produce methodological impairments which jeopardize academic production. Current essay provides an analysis of two highly specific epistemological structures which are frequently mixed up in research and in their use by their main proposers. They are the concept of field in Bourdieu and its employment in discussions on science, and that of arena in Ostrom and its treatment in the commons issue. Possible approximations and the main difficulties between the two notions are exposed through an enrichment of the theoretical debate of sociological production so that the epistemological resources available in research activities could be better understood.|
|Editor:||State University of Maringa|
|Appears in Collections:||Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.