Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Type:||Artigo de periódico|
|Title:||Comparative analysis of two different alar base sutures after Le Fort I osteotomy: randomized double-blind controlled trial|
de Moraes, M
|Abstract:||Objective. The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the efficacy of a new alar base cinch suture by comparing it with the commonly used cinch suture described by Schendel and Delaire in Dr. William Bell's book. Study design. Thirty-five patients submitted to maxillary impaction and/or advancements of >= 3 mm were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group 1 received an extra oral alar base cinch suture, and patients from group 2 received the classic intraoral suture. Alar and alar base width were measured before and after surgery in digital photographs, with the patient's head in a submental oblique view. Data were reported as means and standard deviations, and difference between groups were determined using Welch t test. A P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results. Mean alar base widening was 1.38 mm in group 1 and 2.5 mm in group 2, and mean alar widening was 1.40 mm in group 1 and 2.31 mm in group 2. The difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusion. Extraoral alar base cinch suture was more effective in maintaining preoperative Alar and alar base width compared with classic intraoral nasal suture. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:181-189)|
|Citation:||Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology And Endodontology. Mosby-elsevier, v. 111, n. 2, n. 181, n. 189, 2011.|
|Appears in Collections:||Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.