Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Artigo de periódico
Title: Silicone versus nonsilicone gel dressings: A controlled trial
Author: de Oliveira, GV
Nunes, TA
Magna, LA
Cintra, ML
Kitten, GT
Zarpellon, S
do Amaral, CMR
Abstract: Background. Silicone gel dressings decrease scar volume and soften hypertrophic tissue, allowing it to be more easily controlled by other methods. Although silicone does not appear to be an essential component of the treatment, nonsilicone dressings have been reported to cause no change in physical parameters during a 2-month treatment period. Objective. To compare silicone and nonsilicone gel dressings in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, including a control group, and to evaluate the effectiveness of these treatments using two new assessment techniques. Methods. Patients were randomly chosen to receive silicone or nonsilicone gel dressings in a 4.5-month controlled prospective study. Scar size, induration, and symptoms were evaluated before and after the treatment. Scar color was visually measured using a color palette catalog, and a new device was developed to measure intracicatricial pressure. Results. All of the measured parameters were significantly reduced in both silicone- and nonsilicone-treated groups, as compared to the control, with no significant differences between them. Conclusion. Silicone and nonsilicone get dressings are equally effective in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.
Country: EUA
Editor: Blackwell Science Inc
Citation: Dermatologic Surgery. Blackwell Science Inc, v. 27, n. 8, n. 721, n. 726, 2001.
Rights: fechado
Identifier DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.00345.x
Date Issue: 2001
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WOS000170294200005.pdf296.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.