Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Type:||Artigo de periódico|
|Title:||Evaluation of soft-tissue lesions with F-18-FDG PET/CT: initial results of a prospective trial|
|Abstract:||Purpose of the reportAlthough MRI is utilized for planning the resection of soft-tissue tumors, it is not always capable of differentiating benign from malignant lesions. The risk of local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcomas is increased when biopsies are performed before resection and by inadequate resections. PET associated with computed tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose labeled with fluorine-18 (F-18-FDG PET/CT) may help differentiate between benign and malignant tumors, thus avoiding inadequate resections and making prior biopsies unnecessary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of F-18-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant solid soft-tissue lesions.Materials and methodsPatients with solid lesions of the limbs or abdominal wall detected by MRI were submitted to F-18-FDG PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) cutoff was determined to differentiate malignant from benign tumors. Regardless of the F-18-FDG PET/CT results all patients underwent biopsy and surgery.ResultsMRI was performed in 54 patients, and 10 patients were excluded because of purely lipomatose or cystic lesions. F-18-FDG PET/CT was performed in the remaining 44 patients. Histopathology revealed 26 (59%) benign and 18 (41%) malignant soft-tissue lesions. A significant difference in SUVmax was observed between benign and malignant soft-tissue lesions. The SUVmax cutoff of 3.0 differentiated malignant from benign lesions with 100% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity, 89.6% accuracy, 78.3% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value.Conclusion(18)F-FDG PET/CT seems to be able to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue lesions with good accuracy and very high negative predictive value. Incorporating F-18-FDG PET/CT into the diagnostic algorithm of these patients may prevent inadequate resections and unnecessary biopsies. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.|
|Editor:||Lippincott Williams & Wilkins|
|Citation:||Nuclear Medicine Communications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 35, n. 3, n. 252, n. 259, 2014.|
|Appears in Collections:||Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.