Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/352869
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorunicampConsani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek-
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.titleChemical analysis and Vickers hardness of orthodontic mini-implantspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFeitoza, Christiane Cavalcante-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de-
dc.contributor.authorConsani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek-
dc.contributor.authorBoeck, Eloisa Marcantonio-
dc.contributor.authorPizzol, Karina Eiras Dela Coleta-
dc.contributor.authorLunardi, Nadia-
dc.subjectOrtodontiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherlanguageOrthodonticspt_BR
dc.description.abstractOrthodontic mini-implants are used in clinical practice to provide efficient and aesthetically-pleasing anchorage. Aim: To evaluate the hardness (Vickers hardness) and chemical composition of miniimplant titanium alloys from five commercial brands. Methods: Thirty self-drilling mini-implants, six each from the following commercial brands, were used: Neodent (NEO), Morelli (MOR), Sin (SIN), Conexão (CON), and Rocky Mountain (RMO). The hardness and chemical composition of the titanium alloys were performed by the Vickers hardness test and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, respectively. Results: Vickers hardness was significantly higher in SIN implants than in NEO, MOR, and CON implants. Similarly, VH was significantly higher in RMO implants than in MOR and NEO ones. In addition, VH was higher in CON implants than in NEO ones. There were no significant differences in the proportions of titanium and aluminum in the mini-implant alloy of the five commercial brands. Conversely, the proportion of vanadium differed significantly between CON and MOR/NEO implants. Conclusions: Mini-implants of different brands presented distinct properties of hardness and composition of the alloypt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian journal of oral sciencespt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationBraz. j. oral sci.pt_BR
dc.publisher.cityPiracicaba, SPpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisherUNICAMP/FOPpt_BR
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.volume14pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumber1pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage1pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage4pt_BR
dc.rightsAbertopt_BR
dc.sourceSCOPUSpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1677-3217pt_BR
dc.identifier.eissn1677-3225pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1677-3225v14n1a01pt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-32252015000100001pt_BR
dc.date.available2020-11-21T09:28:21Z-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-21T09:28:21Z-
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Sanches Olivia (olivias@unicamp.br) on 2020-11-21T09:28:21Z No. of bitstreams: 0. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2021-02-11T21:14:42Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 2-s2.0-84929928680.pdf: 156723 bytes, checksum: 62165e0e612b7e29e820259bec1e4d46 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-11-21T09:28:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2015en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/352869-
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Prótese e Periodontiapt_BR
dc.contributor.unidadeFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicabapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordDental materialspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordHardnesspt_BR
dc.identifier.source2-s2.0-84929928680pt_BR
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-4122-9234pt_BR
dc.type.formArtigo originalpt_BR
dc.description.otherSponsorshipsem informaçãopt_BR
Appears in Collections:FOP - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-84929928680.pdf153.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.