Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/341941
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorunicampPerracini, Monica Rodrigues-
dc.contributor.authorunicampMello, Mateus Joaquim Carreira-
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of the short physical performance battery for detecting frailty in older peoplept_BR
dc.contributor.authorPerracini, Monica R-
dc.contributor.authorMello, Mateus-
dc.contributor.authorMáximo, Roberta de Oliveira-
dc.contributor.authorBilton, Tereza L-
dc.contributor.authorFerriolli, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorLustosa, Lygia P-
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre, Tiago da Silva-
dc.subjectBateriaspt_BR
dc.subjectDiagnósticopt_BR
dc.subjectIdosospt_BR
dc.subject.otherlanguageBatteriespt_BR
dc.subject.otherlanguageDiagnosispt_BR
dc.subject.otherlanguageOlder peoplept_BR
dc.description.abstractThe Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is widely used to predict negative health-related outcomes in older adults. However, the cutoff point for the detection of the frailty syndrome is not yet conclusive. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of the SPPB for detecting frailty in community-dwelling older adults. This was a population-based cross-sectional study focusing on households in urban areas. A total of 744 people who were 65 years old or older participated in this study. Frailty was determined by the presence of 3 or more of the following components: unintentional weight loss, self-reported fatigue, weakness, low level of physical activity, and slowness. Diagnostic accuracy measures of the SPPB cutoff points were calculated for the identification of frailty (individuals who were frail) and the frailty process (individuals who were considered to be prefrail and frail). Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Odds ratios for frailty and the frailty process and respective CIs were calculated on the basis of the best cutoff points. A bootstrap analysis was conducted to confirm the internal validity of the findings. The best cutoff point for the determination of frailty was ≤ 8 points (sensitivity = 79.7%; specificity = 73.8%; Youden J statistic = 0.53; positive likelihood ratio = 3.05; area under the curve = 0.85). The best cutoff point for the determination of the frailty process was ≤ 10 points (sensitivity = 75.5%; specificity = 52.8%; Youden J statistic = 0.28; positive likelihood ratio = 1.59; area under the curve = 0.76). The adjusted odds of being frail and being in the frailty process were 7.44 (95% CI = 3.90-14.19) and 2.33 (95% CI = 1.65-3.30), respectively. External validation using separate data was not performed, and the cross-sectional design does not allow SPPB predictive capacity to be established. The SPPB might be used as a screening tool to detect frailty syndrome in community-dwelling older adults, but the cutoff points should be tested in another sample as a further validation steppt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPhysical therapypt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationPhys. ther.pt_BR
dc.publisher.cityCary, NCpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryEstados Unidospt_BR
dc.publisherOxford University Presspt_BR
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.date.monthofcirculationOct.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.firstpage90pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage98pt_BR
dc.rightsFechadopt_BR
dc.sourceSCOPUSpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0031-9023pt_BR
dc.identifier.eissn1538-6724pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ptj/pzz154pt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/ptj/article-abstract/100/1/90/5586703pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQpt_BR
dc.description.sponsordocumentnumber17/2006pt_BR
dc.date.available2020-05-21T18:34:03Z-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-21T18:34:03Z-
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Susilene Barbosa da Silva (susilene@unicamp.br) on 2020-05-21T18:34:03Z No. of bitstreams: 0. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2020-11-11T13:13:27Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 2-s2.0-85078377163.pdf: 37844488 bytes, checksum: 9b360f59617720d516969a81ea723e0f (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-05-21T18:34:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/341941-
dc.contributor.departmentSem informaçãopt_BR
dc.contributor.departmentSem informaçãopt_BR
dc.contributor.unidadeFaculdade de Ciências Médicaspt_BR
dc.contributor.unidadeFaculdade de Ciências Médicaspt_BR
dc.subject.keywordDiagnostic Accuracypt_BR
dc.identifier.source2-s2.0-85078377163pt_BR
dc.creator.orcid0000-0001-9331-3820pt_BR
dc.creator.orcidSem informaçãopt_BR
dc.type.formArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:FCM - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-85078377163.pdf36.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.