Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/336824
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorunicampReis, Mariana Nagle dos-
dc.contributor.authorunicampSetz, Eleonore Zulnara Freire-
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
dc.titleThe key role of protection status in safeguarding the ecological functions of some Neotropical mammalspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNagy-Reis, Mariana B.-
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Milton Cezar-
dc.contributor.authorSetz, Eleonore Z. F.-
dc.contributor.authorChiarello, Adriano G.-
dc.subjectÁreas protegidaspt_BR
dc.subjectServiços ambientaispt_BR
dc.subject.otherlanguageReserves (Protected areas)pt_BR
dc.subject.otherlanguageEcosystem servicespt_BR
dc.description.abstractProtected areas can mediate negative effects of habitat loss and human-related pressures on key ecological groups. However, different protected area categories can vary substantially in their degree of enforcement, which may ensure different levels of effectiveness for biodiversity protection. Because little attempt has been made to quantify this, we investigated the protection effectiveness of different levels of protection (low, intermediate, and high) in maintaining the ecological functions of mammalian species. We assessed this on a selection of five species with varying ecological functions: nine-banded armadillo (insectivore), paca (seed disperser), tayra (omnivore), ocelot (carnivore), and collared peccary (seed predator). Their occupancy probability and the integrity of their ecological functions were estimated and spatialized across landscapes at all protection levels (low, intermediate, and high). In addition, we estimated how many of these species were maintained in each protection status using a minimum of 35% occupancy threshold for each. Our results indicated that higher protection statuses can hold more ecological functions of these mammalian species than areas with lower protection levels. Ocelot and paca heavily relied on areas with higher protection, which can impact the overall ecosystem functioning and ecological services of less protected areas, since these are species performing unique roles in our landscape (mixed-sized prey carnivory and large-sized seed dispersal, respectively). Our study suggests that the degrees of protection can influence the area effectiveness in maintaining certain mammalian species and their ecological functions and ecosystem services. Therefore, management strategies and degree of enforcement should be carefully planned when assigning areas for conservation to ensure the conservation of more sensitive species and preserve more ecological functionspt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBiodiversity and conservationpt_BR
dc.publisher.cityDordrechtpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryPaíses Baixospt_BR
dc.publisherSpringerpt_BR
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.date.monthofcirculationAug.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.volume28pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumber10pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage2599pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage2613pt_BR
dc.rightsFechadopt_BR
dc.sourceWOSpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0960-3115pt_BR
dc.identifier.eissn1572-9710pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10531-019-01783-ypt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10531-019-01783-ypt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPESpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESPpt_BR
dc.description.sponsordocumentnumbersem informaçãopt_BR
dc.description.sponsordocumentnumber305902/2014-8; 303101/2017-2pt_BR
dc.description.sponsordocumentnumber2013/07162-6; 2013/50421-2pt_BR
dc.date.available2020-03-18T18:03:46Z-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-18T18:03:46Z-
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Cintia Oliveira de Moura (cintiaom@unicamp.br) on 2020-03-18T18:03:46Z No. of bitstreams: 0. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2020-07-20T14:18:27Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000474368900008.pdf: 1393743 bytes, checksum: deb68869e404b349f4636da09a94fcd5 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-03-18T18:03:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2019en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/336824-
dc.contributor.departmentsem informaçãopt_BR
dc.contributor.departmentDepartamento de Biologia Animalpt_BR
dc.contributor.unidadeInstituto de Biologiapt_BR
dc.subject.keywordCarnivorypt_BR
dc.subject.keywordSeed dispersalpt_BR
dc.subject.keywordMammal conservationpt_BR
dc.identifier.source474368900008pt_BR
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-0494-1054pt_BR
dc.creator.orcid0000-0001-7638-7086pt_BR
dc.type.formArtigo originalpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorNoteCoordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)CAPES; Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2013/07162-6]; Idea Wild; Brazilian Science Council (CNPq)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [305902/2014-8]; CNPqNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [303101/2017-2]; FAPESPFundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2013/50421-2]pt_BR
Appears in Collections:IB - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
000474368900008.pdf1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.