Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/327915
Type: Artigo
Title: Evaluation Of The Reliability And Validity Of The Newer Aospine Subaxial Cervical Injury Classification (c-3 To C-7)
Author: da Silva
Otavio Turolo; Sabba
Marcelo Ferreira; Gomes Lira
Henrique Igor; Ghizoni
Enrico; Tedeschi
Helder; Patel
Alpesh A.; Joaquim
Andrei Fernandes
Abstract: The authors evaluated a new classification for subaxial cervical spine trauma (SCST) recently proposed by the AOSpine group based on morphological criteria obtained using CT imaging. METHODS Patients with SCST treated at the authors' institution according to the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification system were included. Five different blinded researchers classified patients' injuries according to the new AOSpine system using CT imaging at 2 different times (4-week interval between each assessment). Reliability was assessed using the kappa index (kappa), while validity was inferred by comparing the classification obtained with the treatment performed. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were included: 31 underwent surgical treatment, and 20 were managed nonsurgically. lntraobserver agreement for subgroups ranged from 0.61 to 0.93, and interobserver agreement was 0.51 (first assessment) and 0.6 (second assessment). Intraobserver agreement for groups ranged from 0.66 to 0.95, and interobserver agreement was 0.52 (first assessment) and 0.63 (second assessment). The kappa index in all evaluations was 0.67 for Type A, 0.08 for Type B, and 0.68 for Type C injuries, and for the facet modifier it was 0.33 (F1), 0.4 (F2), 0.56 (F3), and 0.75 (F4). Complete agreement for all components was attained in 25 cases (49%) (19 Type A and 6 Type C), and for subgroups it was attained in 22 cases (43.1%) (16 Type A0 and 6 Type C). Type A0 injuries were treated conservatively or surgically according to their neurological status and ligamentous status. Type C injuries were treated surgically in almost all cases, except one. CONCLUSIONS While the general reliability of the newer AOSpine system for SCST was acceptable for group classification, significant limitations were identified for subgroups. Type B injuries were rarely diagnosed, and only mild (Type A0) and extreme severe (Type C) injuries had a high rate of interobserver agreement. Facet modifiers and intermediate injury patterns require better descriptions to improve their low agreement in cases of SCST.
Subject: Cervical Trauma
Classification
Evaluation
Reliability
Subaxial Cervical Spine
Treatment
Editor: Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons
Rolling Meadows
Citation: Journal Of Neurosurgery-spine. Amer Assoc Neurological Surgeons, v. 25, p. 303 - 308, 2016.
Rights: fechado
Identifier DOI: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151039
Address: http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151039?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&
Date Issue: 2016
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
000381782200003.pdf1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.