Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/324049
Type: Artigo
Title: Integrating Ecosystem Functions Into Restoration Ecology—recent Advances And Future Directions
Author: Kollmann J.
Meyer S.T.
Bateman R.
Conradi T.
Gossner M.M.
de Souza Mendonça M.
Jr.
Fernandes G.W.
Hermann J.-M.
Koch C.
Müller S.C.
Oki Y.
Overbeck G.E.
Paterno G.B.
Rosenfield M.F.
Toma T.S.P.
Weisser W.W.
Abstract: Including ecosystem functions into restoration ecology has been repeatedly suggested, yet there is limited evidence that this is taking place without bias to certain habitats, species, or functions. We reviewed the inclusion of ecosystem functions in restoration and potential relations to habitats and species by extracting 224 publications from the literature (2004–2013). Most studies investigated forests, fewer grasslands or freshwaters, and fewest wetlands or marine habitats. Of all studies, 14% analyzed only ecosystem functions, 44% considered both biotic composition and functions, 42% exclusively studied the biotic component, mostly vascular plants, more rarely invertebrates or vertebrates, and least often microbes. Most studies investigating ecosystem functions focused on nutrient cycling (26%), whereas productivity (18%), water relations (16%), and geomorphological processes (14%) were less covered; carbon sequestration (10%), decomposition (6%), and trophic interactions (6%) were rarely studied. Monitoring of ecosystem functions was common in forests and grasslands, but the functions considered depended on the study organisms. These associations indicate research opportunities for certain habitats, species, and functions. Overall, the call to include ecosystem functions in restoration has been heard; however, a lack of clarity about the ecosystem functions to be included and deficits of feasible field methods are major obstacles for a functional approach. Restoration ecology should learn from recent advances in rapid assessment of ecosystem functions, and by a closer integration with biodiversity–ecosystem functioning research. Not all functions need to be measured in all ecosystems, but more functions than the few commonly addressed would improve the understanding of restored ecosystems. © 2016 Society for Ecological Restoration
Subject: Biodiversity Research
Habitat Types
Monitoring
Organism Groups
Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment
Editor: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
Rights: fechado
Identifier DOI: 10.1111/rec.12422
Address: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84984914643&doi=10.1111%2frec.12422&partnerID=40&md5=53c3d151731cefa64b4e111de8cacd12
Date Issue: 2016
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-84984914643.pdf963.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.