Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Type: Artigo
Title: Validation Of The 36-item Version Of The Who Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (whodas 2.0) For Assessing Women’s Disability And Functioning Associated With Maternal Morbidity
Title Alternative: Validação Da Versão De 36 Itens Do Who Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (whodas 2.0) Para A Avaliação De Incapacidade E Funcionalidade Da Mulher Associada à Morbidade Materna
Author: Silveira C.
Parpinelli M.A.
Pacagnella R.C.
Andreucci C.B.
Angelini C.R.
Ferreira E.C.
Cecatti J.G.
Santos J.P.
Zanardi D.M.
Costa M.L.
Camargo R.P.
Cecchino G.N.
Bussadori J.C.
Souza R.T.
Abstract: To validate the translation and adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese of 36 items from the World Health Organizaton Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), regarding their content and structure (construct), in a female population after pregnancy. Methods This is a validation of an instrument for the evaluation of disability and functioning and an assessment of its psychometric properties, performed in a tertiary maternity and a referral center specialized in high-risk pregnancies in Brazil. A sample of 638 women in different postpartum periods who had either a normal or a complicated pregnancy was included. The structure was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while the content and relationships among the domains were assessed through Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The sociodemographic characteristics were identified, and the mean scores with their standard deviations for the 36 questions of the WHODAS 2.0 were calculated. The internal consistency was evaluated byCronbach’s α. Results Cronbach’s α was higher than 0.79 for both sets of questons of the questionnaire. The EFA and CFA for the main 32 questions exhibited a total variance of 54.7% (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin [KMO] measure of sampling adequacy = 0.934; p < 0.001) and 53.47% (KMO = 0.934; p < 0.001) respectively. There was a significant correlation among the 6 domains (r = 0.571–0.876), and a moderate correlation among all domains (r = 0.476–0.694). Conclusion The version of the WHODAS 2.0 instrument adapted to Brazilian Portuguese showed good psychometric properties in this sample, and therefore could be applied to populations of women regarding their reproductive history. © 2017 by Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Subject: Disability And Health (icf)
International Classification Of Functioning
Maternal And Child Health
Pregnancy Complications
Validation Studies
Editor: Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
Citation: Revista Brasileira De Ginecologia E Obstetricia. Federacao Brasileira Das Sociedades De Ginecologia E Obstetricia, v. 39, n. 2, p. 44 - 52, 2017.
Rights: aberto
Identifier DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598599
Date Issue: 2017
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-85013810936.pdf255.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.