Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/319947
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE DE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.identifier.isbn1873-5754pt
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.titleUsing An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach To Prioritize Public Policies Addressing Family Farming In Brazilpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPetrinipt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMA; Rochapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJV; Brownpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJC; Bispopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRCpt_BR
unicamp.author.emailmapetrini@gmail.com; jansle.rocha@feagri.unicamp.br; jcbrown2@ku.edu; rafael.bispo@feagri.unicamp.brpt_BR
dc.subjectAnalytic Hierarchy Processpt_BR
dc.subjectDecision-makingpt_BR
dc.subjectMultiple Stakeholderspt_BR
dc.subjectFamily Farmingpt_BR
dc.subjectSugarcanept_BR
dc.description.abstractIn Brazil, some see intensive, large-scale production of sugarcane-based ethanol, based on a model of capital and land concentration, as a threat to the survival of family farming. Family farmers are increasingly under pressure to sell or rent land to mills where sugarcane monoculture is expanding. In this context, the government is working to formulate or change public policies in order to support farmer livelihoods in sugarcane growing regions. The present study is based on research conducted in the municipality of Ipiranga de Goias, Goias State, Brazil. It employs the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, with participation of stakeholders at federal, state and municipal levels, to support public policy decision-making addressing family farming. The stakeholders prioritize environmental and economic benefits as the most important criteria requiring the attention of policy makers. Also, stakeholders agree that diversification of production is the most appropriate alternative for strengthening family farming. The AHP approach can be the starting point in the formulation of public policies. The approach helps ensure transparency, and it purposefully includes family farmer points of view. Policies derived from this process, therefore, may have a higher likelihood of being supported and accepted by farmers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.relation.ispartofLand Use Policypt_BR
dc.publisher.cityOXFORDpt_BR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTDpt_BR
dc.date.issued2016pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy. ELSEVIER SCI LTD, n. 51, p. 85 - 94.pt_BR
dc.language.isoEnglishpt_BR
dc.description.volume51pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumberpt_BR
dc.description.firstpage85pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage94pt_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.sourceWOSpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377pt_BR
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000369555700009pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.029pt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www-sciencedirect-com.ez88.periodicos.capes.gov.br/science/article/pii/S0264837715003403pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFeagri/Proap/Capespt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipUnicamp/Faepex [519.292-0556/14]pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCapes (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF-BCS-GSS [1227160]pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorship1Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorship1Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)pt_BR
dc.date.available2016-12-06T18:30:04Z-
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-06T18:30:04Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2016-12-06T18:30:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 000369555700009.pdf: 1674162 bytes, checksum: c99086aac8b7c3e15d56bf0aafb7cae2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/319947-
dc.description.conferencelocationpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
000369555700009.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.