Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/319830
Type: Resenha
Title: Women's Values And Preferences And Health State Valuations For Thromboprophylaxis During Pregnancy: A Cross-sectional Interview Study
Author: Bates
SM; Alonso-Coello
P; Tikkinen
KAO; Ebrahim
S; Lopes
LC; McDonald
SD; Zhou
Q; Akl
EA; Neumann
I; Jacobsen
AF; Zhang
YQ; Santamara
A; Annichino-Bizzacchi
JM; Sandset
PM; Bitar
W; Eckman
MH; Guyatt
GH
Abstract: Background: Pregnant women with prior venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. Prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) reduces that risk but is inconvenient, costly, and may be associated with increased risks of obstetrical bleeding. The views of pregnant women, crucial when making prophylaxis recommendations, are currently unknown. Methods: Cross-sectional international multicenter study. We included women with a history of VTE who were either pregnant or planning pregnancy. We provided information regarding risk of VTE recurrence with and without LMWH and determined participant's willingness to receive LMWH prophylaxis through direct choice exercises, preference-elicitation (utilities) for health states (e.g. burden of LMWH prophylaxis), and a probability trade-off exercise. Results: Of 123 women, more women at high risk than those at low risk of recurrence (86.4% vs. 60.0%; p=0.003) chose to use LMWH. The median threshold reduction in VTE at which women were willing to accept use of LMWH, given a 16% risk of VTE without prophylaxis, was 3% (interquartile range: 1 to 6). Participants' evaluation of the relevant health states varied widely and was unrelated to their direct choices to use or not use LMWH. Conclusions: Although the majority of women with a previous VTE, pregnant or planning pregnancy choose to take LMWH during pregnancy, a minority -and in low risk women, a large minority-do not. Our results highlight the need for individualized shared decision-making (SDM) in the clinical encounter, and for guideline panels to make weak recommendations in favor of LMWH that make clear the need for SDM. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subject: Women's Health
Obstetrics And Gynecology
Evidence-based Medicine
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Decision Making
Editor: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Rights: fechado
Identifier DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.015
Address: http://www-sciencedirect-com.ez88.periodicos.capes.gov.br/science/article/pii/S0049384815302309
Date Issue: 2016
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
000373732600004.pdf604.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.