Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/319828
Type: Resenha
Title: Effect-directed Analysis Supporting Monitoring Of Aquatic Environments - An In-depth Overview
Author: Brack
W; Ait-Aissa
S; Burgess
RM; Busch
W; Creusot
N; Di Paolo
C; Escher
BI; Hewitt
LM; Hilscherova
K; Hollender
J; Hollert
H; Jonker
W; Kool
J; Lamoree
M; Muschket
M; Neumann
S; Rostkowski
P; Ruttkies
C; Schollee
J; Schymanski
EL; Schulze
T; Seiler
TB; Tindall
AJ; Umbuzeiro
GD; Vrana
B; Krauss
M
Abstract: Aquatic environments are often contaminated with complex mixtures of chemicals that may pose a risk to ecosystems and human health. This contamination cannot be addressed with target analysis alone but tools are required to reduce this complexity and identify those chemicals that might cause adverse effects. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) is designed to meet this challenge and faces increasing interest in water and sediment quality monitoring. Thus, the present paper summarizes current experience with the EDA approach and the tools required, and provides practical advice on their application. The paper highlights the need for proper problem formulation and gives general advice for study design. As the EDA approach is directed by toxicity, basic principles for the selection of bioassays are given as well as a comprehensive compilation of appropriate assays, including their strengths and weaknesses. A specific focus is given to strategies for sampling, extraction and bioassay dosing since they strongly impact prioritization of toxicants in EDA. Reduction of sample complexity mainly relies on fractionation procedures, which are discussed in this paper, including quality assurance and quality control. Automated combinations of fractionation, biotesting and chemical analysis using so-called hyphenated tools can enhance the throughput and might reduce the risk of artifacts in laboratory work. The key to determining the chemical structures causing effects is analytical toxicant identification. The latest approaches, tools, software and databases for target-, suspect and non-target screening as well as unknown identification are discussed together with analytical and toxicological confirmation approaches. A better understanding of optimal use and combination of EDA tools will help to design efficient and successful toxicant identification studies in the context of quality monitoring in multiply stressed environments. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Subject: Toxicant Identification
Bioassay
Dosing
Enrichment
Fractionation
Non-target Analysis
Editor: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Citation: The Science Of The Total Environment. ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, n. 544, p. 1073 - 1118.
Rights: fechado
Identifier DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.102
Address: http://www-sciencedirect-com.ez88.periodicos.capes.gov.br/science/article/pii/S0048969715310834
Date Issue: 2016
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
000369491500112.pdf2.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.