Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/28908
Type: Artigo de periódico
Title: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5. revisão sistemática da literatura
Title Alternative: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - BI-RADS®: positive predictive value of categories 3, 4 and 5. A systematic literature review
Author: Kestelman, Fabíola Procaci
Souza, Gustavo Antônio de
Thuler, Luiz Claudio
Martins, Gabriela
Freitas, Vivianne Aguilera Rolim de
Canella, Ellyete de Oliveira
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review the literature about the positive predictive value of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A research was performed in the online Medline database, entering the terms predictive value and BI-RADS. Eleven studies were included in this review. RESULTS: The positive predictive values ranged respectively between 0% and 8%, 4% and 62%, and 54% and 100% for BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5. Three studies have also evaluated morphological criteria with higher positive predictive value in mammography, mass with spiculated margins being the finding with highest positive predictive value for malignancy. CONCLUSION: A high variability was found in the reviewed literature among positive predictive values of BI-RADS® categories 3, 4 and 5, although methodological differences have been identified, limiting the comparative analysis.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar artigos, na literatura, que verificam o valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizada pesquisa na base de dados Medline utilizando os termos predictive value e BI-RADS. Foram incluídos 11 artigos nesta revisão. RESULTADOS: O valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 variou entre 0% e 8%, 4% e 62%, 54% e 100%, respectivamente. Três artigos avaliaram, concomitantemente, os critérios morfológicos das lesões que apresentaram maior valor preditivo positivo na mamografia, sendo nódulo espiculado o critério com maior valor preditivo positivo. CONCLUSÃO: Houve grande variabilidade do valor preditivo positivo das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do BI-RADS® em todos os estudos, porém foram identificadas diferenças metodológicas que limitaram a comparação desses estudos.
Subject: Mamografia
BI-RADS®
Câncer de mama
Mammography
BI-RADS®
Breast cancer
Editor: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem
Rights: aberto
Identifier DOI: 10.1590/S0100-39842007000300008
Address: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842007000300008
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842007000300008
Date Issue: 1-Jun-2007
Appears in Collections:Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - Unicamp

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S0100-39842007000300008.pdf137.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.