Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/2418
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleUse of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling - results of an international survey in 10 countriespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGemzell-Danielsson, Kristinapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCho, SiHyunpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorInki, Pirjopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Dianapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorReid, Robertpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBahamondes, Luispt_BR
unicamp.authorBahamondes, Luispt_BR
unicamp.author.externalGemzell-Danielsson, Kristinapt
unicamp.author.externalCho, SiHyunpt
unicamp.author.externalInki, Pirjopt
unicamp.author.externalMansour, Dianapt
unicamp.author.externalReid, Robertpt
dc.subjectContraceptionpt_BR
dc.subjectCounselingpt_BR
dc.subjectHealth care providerspt_BR
dc.subject.wosFEMALE PHYSICIANSpt_BR
dc.subject.wosPERCEPTIONSpt_BR
dc.subject.wosWOMENpt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study was conducted to determine the personal choices of contraceptive methods among an international sample of contraception health care professionals (HCPs) and to determine if these choices are concordant with their recommendations to women. Study Design: In an anonymous online survey, 1001 HCPs actively involved in contraceptive counseling [obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), general practitioners (GPs) and midwives (only in Sweden)] from 10 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Korea, Mexico, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) were asked about their personal use of contraceptive methods and their recommendations to women in two different clinical scenarios: for spacing between children (Group A) and after completion of the family (Group B). Results: The largest HCP group was OB/GYNs (67.1%), followed by GPs (31.4%) and midwives (1.5%). A total of 42.7% of respondents were male, and 57.3% were female. The majority of respondents were aged 36-45 years (38.9%) or 46-55 years (42.8%), 79.7% had children, and 53.9% were currently using contraception (by themselves or by their partners). Among 540 contraceptive users, the three most common methods were the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; 29.3%), combined oral contraceptives (COCs; 20.0%) and condoms (17.0%). OB/GYNs were more likely to be using the LNG-IUS than GPs (p=.014). Gender did not seem to influence contraceptive preference. Reasons for these choices were largely influenced by family situation and high contraceptive efficacy (for the LNG-IUS) or side effects caused by other methods (for condoms). The top contraceptive recommendation was COCs for Group A and the LNG-IUS for Group B. HCPs currently using COCs and the LNG-IUS were more likely to recommend these methods than other contraceptive methods for Group A and Group B, respectively. Conclusions: The most popular contraceptive method in this sample of HCPs was the LNG-IUS. Choice of contraceptive method was driven by family situation, age and profession. It appears that, in this sample, personal contraceptive use influences contraceptive recommendations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.pt
dc.relation.ispartofContraceptionpt_BR
dc.publisher.cityNew Yorkpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.date.issued2012pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationContraception. Elsevier, v.86, n.6, p.631-638, 2012pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.volume86pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumber6pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage631pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage638pt_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.sourceWOSpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0010-7824pt_BR
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000311195700005pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.002pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipBayer Healthcarept_BR
dc.date.available2013-09-19T18:06:48Z
dc.date.available2016-07-01T15:11:26Z-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-19T18:06:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T15:11:26Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2013-09-19T18:06:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2016-07-01T15:11:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/2418
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/2418-
dc.contributor.departmentGenecologia e Obstetrícia
dc.contributor.unidadeFCMpt
Appears in Collections:FCM - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.