Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/201944
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE DE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleA Comparison Between Characterization And Biological Properties Of Brazilian Fresh And Aged Propolis.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Eduardo Morgadopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorStock, Danielept_BR
dc.contributor.authorChada, Fabio José Garciapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFinger, Daianept_BR
dc.contributor.authorSawaya, Alexandra Christine Helena Franklandpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEberlin, Marcos Nogueirapt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFelsner, Maria Lurdespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorQuináia, Sueli Pérciopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Marta Chagaspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Yohandra Reyespt_BR
unicamp.authorLaboratório Thomson de Espectrometria de Massas, Departamento de Química Analítica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil.pt_BR
unicamp.authorAlexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Departamento de Fisiologia Vegetal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil.pt_BR
unicamp.authorMarcos Nogueira Eberlin, Laboratório Thomson de Espectrometria de Massas, Departamento de Química Analítica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil.pt_BR
unicamp.author.externalEduardo Morgado Schmidt, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), CEDETEG, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 03 Vila Carli, 85040-080 Guarapuava, PR, Brazilpt
unicamp.author.externalDaniele Stock, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), CEDETEG, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 03 Vila Carli, 85040-080 Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.pt
unicamp.author.externalFabio José Garcia Chada, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Avenida Augusto Correa No. 1, 66075-110 Belém, PA, Brazil.pt
unicamp.author.externalDaiane Finger, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), CEDETEG, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 03 Vila Carli, 85040-080 Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.pt
unicamp.author.externalMaria Lurdes Felsner, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), CEDETEG, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 03 Vila Carli, 85040-080 Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.pt
unicamp.author.externalSueli Pércio Quináia, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), CEDETEG, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 03 Vila Carli, 85040-080 Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.pt
unicamp.author.externalMarta Chagas Monteiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Avenida Augusto Correa No. 1, 66075-110 Belém, PA, Brazil.pt
unicamp.author.externalYohandra Reyes Torres, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), CEDETEG, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 03 Vila Carli, 85040-080 Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.pt
dc.description.abstractAs propolis is a highly valued bee product, we aimed to verify the quality of aged propolis, investigating their phenolic and flavonoid composition, levels of toxic metals, radical scavenging and antimicrobial activities. Samples of fresh and aged propolis of six different beekeepers, from the same geographical location, were investigated in terms of their phenolic and flavonoid composition and levels of Pb, Cd, and Cr, as well as radical scavenging and antimicrobial activities. The two groups of propolis had similar qualitative composition by HPLC-PDA and ESI(-)-MS. Fresh propolis and aged propolis show no differences when average values of extraction yield, flavonoids, EC50, or MIC were compared and both types of propolis showed good antimicrobial activity at low concentrations. Only levels of phenolic compounds were higher in fresh propolis. The propolis samples considered in this study, aged or fresh, had similar qualitative composition, although they were collected in different periods. Samples only differed in their levels of total phenolic content. Moreover, aged propolis conserves significant radical scavenging and antimicrobial properties. We suggest that aged propolis should not be discarded but explored for alternative applications.en
dc.relation.ispartofBiomed Research Internationalpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationBiomed Res Intpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationBiomed Research International. v. 2014, p. 257617, 2014.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.volume2014pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage257617pt_BR
dc.rightsabertopt_BR
dc.rights.holderpt_BR
dc.sourcePubMedpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2314-6141pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2014/257617pt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25530958pt_BR
dc.date.available2015-11-27T13:43:56Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-27T13:43:56Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-27T13:43:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 pmed_25530958.pdf: 3387740 bytes, checksum: ae2b2a095d7593664fc2d4cc70ae72f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/201944-
dc.identifier.idPubmed25530958pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
pmed_25530958.pdf3.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.