Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/201589
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE DE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleDoes The Reciproc File Remove Root Canal Bacteria And Endotoxins As Effectively As Multifile Rotary Systems?pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, A C Spt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMartinho, F Cpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, L Mpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRabang, H R Cpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGomes, B P F Apt_BR
unicamp.authorA C S Marinho, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Piracicaba Dental School - State University of Campinas- UNICAMP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.pt_BR
unicamp.author.externalF C Martinho,pt
unicamp.author.externalL M Gonçalves,pt
unicamp.author.externalH R C Rabang,pt
unicamp.author.externalB P F A Gomes,pt
dc.subjectBacterial Reductionpt_BR
dc.subjectDisinfectionpt_BR
dc.subjectEndodontic Treatmentpt_BR
dc.subjectEndotoxinspt_BR
dc.subjectReciprocating Motionpt_BR
dc.subjectRotary Instrumentspt_BR
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the effectiveness of Reciproc for the removal of cultivable bacteria and endotoxins from root canals in comparison with multifile rotary systems. The root canals of forty human single-rooted mandibular pre-molars were contaminated with an Escherichia coli suspension for 21 days and randomly assigned to four groups according to the instrumentation system: GI - Reciproc (VDW); GII - Mtwo (VDW); GIII - ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer); and GIV -FKG Race(™) (FKG Dentaire) (n = 10 per group). Bacterial and endotoxin samples were taken with a sterile/apyrogenic paper point before (s1) and after instrumentation (s2). Culture techniques determined the colony-forming units (CFU) and the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay was used for endotoxin quantification. Results were submitted to paired t-test and anova. At s1, bacteria and endotoxins were recovered in 100% of the root canals investigated (40/40). After instrumentation, all systems were associated with a highly significant reduction of the bacterial load and endotoxin levels, respectively: GI - Reciproc (99.34% and 91.69%); GII - Mtwo (99.86% and 83.11%); GIII - ProTaper (99.93% and 78.56%) and GIV - FKG Race(™) (99.99% and 82.52%) (P < 0.001). No statistical difference were found amongst the instrumentation systems regarding bacteria and endotoxin removal (P > 0.01). The reciprocating single file, Reciproc, was as effective as the multifile rotary systems for the removal of bacteria and endotoxins from root canals.en
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Endodontic Journalpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationInt Endod Jpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014-Julpt_BR
dc.identifier.citationInternational Endodontic Journal. , 2014-Jul.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.volumept_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.rights.holder© 2014 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.pt_BR
dc.sourcePubMedpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1365-2591pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iej.12346pt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25070009pt_BR
dc.date.available2015-11-27T13:43:01Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-27T13:43:01Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-27T13:43:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 pmed_25070009.pdf: 181002 bytes, checksum: 7cba61c7ccec1095b4945a2dfec2a03e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/201589-
dc.identifier.idPubmed25070009pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
pmed_25070009.pdf176.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.