Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/195456
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUNIVERSIDADE DE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINASpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleEffects Of Method And Mri Slice Thickness On Entorhinal Cortex Volumetry.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBonilha, Leonardopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, Elianept_BR
dc.contributor.authorCendes, Fernandopt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLi, Li Mpt_BR
unicamp.authorLeonardo Bonilha, Laboratory of Neuroimaging, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Ibonilha@unicamp.brpt_BR
unicamp.author.externalEliane Kobayashi,pt
unicamp.author.externalFernando Cendes,pt
unicamp.author.externalLi M Li,pt
dc.subjectAdultpt_BR
dc.subjectAnalysis Of Variancept_BR
dc.subjectBrain Mappingpt_BR
dc.subjectEntorhinal Cortexpt_BR
dc.subjectFemalept_BR
dc.subjectHumanspt_BR
dc.subjectImage Enhancementpt_BR
dc.subjectImage Processing, Computer-assistedpt_BR
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingpt_BR
dc.subjectMalept_BR
dc.subjectMiddle Agedpt_BR
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the effect of the method of analysis and the MRI slice thickness on entorhinal cortex volumetry. A T1 gradient echo 3D volumetric acquisition was reformatted into different slice thickness and analyzed by edge-tracing. We performed two different forms of analysis of images with 3 mm slice thickness: edge-tracing and pixel by pixel. There was difference among the volumes obtained from different slice thickness (p < 0.001), and also difference between the two different methods of analysis (p < 0.05). The use of thick slices is time saving, but volumes are linearly increased; different methods of segmentation also yields different values. The form of volumetric analysis of the entorhinal cortex should be evaluated in advance to prevent false estimates in longitudinal studies.en
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroreportpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationNeuroreportpt_BR
dc.date.issued2003-Julpt_BR
dc.identifier.citationNeuroreport. v. 14, n. 10, p. 1291-5, 2003-Jul.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.description.volume14pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage1291-5pt_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.rights.holderpt_BR
dc.sourcePubMedpt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0959-4965pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.wnr.0000077545.91466.73pt_BR
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12876459pt_BR
dc.date.available2015-11-27T12:52:17Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-27T12:52:17Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-27T12:52:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 pmed_12876459.pdf: 233787 bytes, checksum: 5ebbd635478199e1b760122eb5f970cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/195456-
dc.identifier.idPubmed12876459pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
pmed_12876459.pdf228.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.