Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Type:||Artigo de periódico|
|Title:||[assessment Of 3 Radiographic Methods (conventional Periapical, Digital Periapical, And Panoramic) Ni The Diagnosis Of Artificially Produced Periapical Lesions].|
|Author:||de Almeida, S M|
Bóscolo, F N
Haiter Neto, F
dos Santos, J C
|Abstract:||This research was carried out in order to evaluate three radiographic methods--conventional periapical, digital periapical and panoramic--in the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions. For this purpose, 5 mandibles, with lesions produced by means of spherical drills of different sizes, were used. The research was divided into five distinct phases, as follows: phase Z (initial)--characterized by the absence of lesion; phase R--lesion produced with a number 6 drill; phase J--lesion produced with a number 8 drill; phase D--lesion produced with a number 10 drill; and phase H--lesion reaching the vestibular cortex. The lesions were produced in quadrants. Radiographs were made after each phase and analyzed by 4 experts in radiology. For the digital system there was statistically significant difference in phase R (in the region of incisors) and in phase H (in the region of premolars). In the region of molars there was statistically significant difference in phase D for panoramic radiography. It must be pointed out that panoramic radiography produced the less effective results in phase H.|
In Vitro Techniques
Radiography, Dental, Digital
|Date Issue:||-1-Uns- -1|
|Appears in Collections:||Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - Unicamp|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.