Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/107971
Type: Artigo de periódico
Title: Review Of Comparative Studies Between Bone Densitometry And Quantitative Ultrasound Of The Calcaneus In Osteoporosis
Author: dos Santos Floter M.
Bittar C.K.
Zabeu J.L.A.
Carneiro A.C.R.
Abstract: Objective: To assess the utility of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneus for diagnosing osteoporosis compared to the gold standard, bone densitometry using dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), according to published reports. Design: In this systematic review, the Medline/ /PUB MED, Medline Ovid and Journals@Ovid, and Wilson General Sciences Full Text database were used. The search strategy involved use of the following MeSH descriptors: [osteoporosis AND (densitometry OR ultrasonography)], and 39 articles published between 2001 and April 2010 were assessed. However, only six articles met the inclusion criteria: sensitivity and specificity of QUS, sample (women or men with no treatment or other di sease likely to change bone mass index), devices used, comparative T-score between QUS of the calcaneus and DXA. The GE-Lunar Achilles and Hologic Sahara devices were used in most of the tests reported and were effective. Results: All studies assessed compared QUS of the calcaneus to DXA of the lumbar spine or femoral neck, as the gold standard. QUS sensitivity ranged from 79% to 93% and specificity ranged from 28% to 90% when at the lower threshold. It is a controversial parameter, because the gold-standard threshold (T-score < -2.5, DXA) could not be used for QUS without errors in osteoporosis diagnosis. All studies had a threshold determined by the authors' criteria, with a variability of -1.7 (pDXA T--score) and -2.4 for QUS, leading to the same prevalence of osteoporosis, and a T-score of < -3.65 for QUS was equivalent to a T-score < -2.5 for DXA.Conclusions: Based on the analysis of seven stu -dies, we conclude that QUS of the calcaneus still cannot be used to confirm diagnosis of osteoporosis by comparing the results to those of patients who had already received such a diagnosis based on DXA. However, further research should be conducted in this area, because it is possible to improve the number diagnoses by varying the cutoff T-score. Furthermore, using QUS of the calcaneus was a helpful tool for assessing pathological fractures, whether or not they were associated with osteoporosis.
Editor: 
Rights: aberto
Identifier DOI: 
Address: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84864742944&partnerID=40&md5=c3f6aae50bbcdf7d49a1d0a1f29cdcdc
Date Issue: 2011
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
2-s2.0-84864742944.pdf768.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.